Bibliographic references

  • Barbier M. & Cointet, J-P. (2012). Reconstruction of Socio-Semantic Dynamics in Sciences-Society Networks: Methodology and Epistemology of Large Textual Corpuses Analysis, Special session on Digital Platforms for STS, XIth Annual Conference of the Science and Democracy Network (SDN), Paris.
  • Benkler, Y., Roberts, H., Faris, R., Solow-Niederman, A., & Etling, B. (2013). Social Mobilization and the Networked Public Sphere: Mapping the SOPA-PIPA Debate (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2295953). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2295953
  • Bertin, J. (1999). Sémiologie graphique les diagrammes, les réseaux, les cartes. Paris: Ed. de l’EHESS.
  • Brinton, W., (1939), Graphic Presentation, New York, NY: Brinton Associates.
  • Börner, K. (2010). Atlas of science: visualizing what we know. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Boczkowski, P. J. (2009). Technology, Monitoring, and Imitation in Contemporary News Work. Communication, Culture & Critique, 2(1), 39–59. doi:10.1111/j.1753-9137.2008.01028.x
  • Burdick, A., & Drucker, J., Lunenfeld, Peter. (2012). Digital_humanities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Chavalarias, D., & Cointet, J.-P. (2013). Phylomemetic Patterns in Science Evolution—The Rise and Fall of Scientific Fields. PLoS ONE, 8(2), e54847. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054847
  • Cohen, P. (2010, December 16). In 500 Billion Words, a New Window on Culture. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/17/books/17words.html
  • Desrosières, A. (2008). Analyse des Données et Sciences Humaines: Comment Cartographier le Monde Social. Journ@l Électronique d’Histoire des Probabilités et de la Statistique, 4(2), 11-18. Retrieved from http://www.jehps.net/Decembre2008/Desrosieres.pdf
  • Diminescu, D. (2012). Introduction: Digital methods for the exploration, analysis and mapping of e-diasporas. Social Science Information, 51(4), 451–458. doi:10.1177/0539018412456918
  • Diski, J. (2011, January 20). Short Cuts. London Review of Books, p. 20.
  • Evans, J. A. (2008). Electronic Publication and the Narrowing of Science and Scholarship. Science, 321(5887), 395–399. doi:10.1126/science.1150473
  • Farinelli, Franco. 2009. La crisi della ragione cartografica. Torino: Einaudi.
  • Gillespie, T., Boczkowski, P. & Foot, K. (forthcoming), Media technologies, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Ghitalla, F. (2011). Le projet cartographique : les données qualifiées. L’Atelier de Cartographie. Retrieved from http://ateliercartographie.wordpress.com/2011/09/01/le-projet-cartographique-les-donnees-qualifiees/
  • Ghitalla, F. (2013a). Des boussoles et des territoires. L’Atelier de Cartographie. Retrieved from http://ateliercartographie.wordpress.com/2013/01/09/des-boussoles-et-des-territoires/
  • Ghitalla, F. (2013b). Le projet cartographique (1) : l’ingénieur et le documentaliste. L’Atelier de Cartographie. Retrieved from http://ateliercartographie.wordpress.com/2011/06/09/le-projet-cartographique-1-lingenieur-et- le-documentaliste/
  • Gitelman, L. (2013). “Raw data” is an oxymoron, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Gladwell, M. (2010, October 4). Small Change. The New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/04/101004fa_fact_gladwell
  • Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2001). Integrating Scientometric Indicators into Sociological Studies: Methodical and Methodological Problems. Scientometrics, 52(3), 411–434. doi:10.1023/A:1014243832084
  • Goffman, E., (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin Books.
  • Healy, K. & Moody, J. (forthcoming), Data Visualization in Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology.
  • Ingold, T. (2007). Lines: a brief history. London; New York: Routledge.
  • Issenberg, S. (2012). How Obama Used Big Data to Rally Voters. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/508836/how-obama-used-big-data-to-rally-voters-part-1/
  • Kay, L., Newman, N., Youtie, J., Porter, A. L., & Rafols, I. (2012). Patent Overlay Mapping: Visualizing Technological Distance. arXiv:1208.4380 [physics]. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.4380
  • Lacoste, Y., (1976), Attention: Géographie!. Hérodote, 1, 3-8.
  • Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65–100. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(87)80026-5
  • Lévy, J. (2012). A Cartographic Turn? Revue électronique des sciences humaines et sociales. Retrieved from http://www.espacestemps.net/articles/a-cartographic-turn/
  • Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2011). Mapping (USPTO) Patent Data using Overlays to Google Maps. arXiv:1110.5712 [physics]. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.5712
  • Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348–362. doi:10.1002/asi.20967
  • Lima, M. (2011). Visual complexity: mapping patterns of information. New York: Princeton Architectural Press. Macchi, G. & Mullender, J., (1980), Cartes et Figures de la Terre, Paris: Ed. du Centre Pompidou.
  • Marche, S. (2012). Literature is not Data: Against Digital Humanities. Retrieved from http://lareviewofbooks.org/essay/literature-is-not-data-against-digital-humanities/
  • Mayer, K. (2011). Scientific images? How touching! Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 7(1), 29 – 45.
  • Menaker, D. (2013, November 23). Taking Our Selfies Seriously. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/24/opinion/sunday/taking-our-selfies-seriously.html
  • McCandless, D. (2009). Information is beautiful. London: Collins.
  • Michel, J.-B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., Pickett, J. P., Hoiberg, D., Clancy, D., Norvig, P., Orwant, J., Pinker, S, Nowak, M.A. & Aiden, E. L. (2011). Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books. Science, 331(6014), 176–182. doi:10.1126/science.1199644
  • Moretti, F. (2007). Graphs, maps, trees: abstract models for literary history. London: Verso.
  • Moretti, F. (2013). Distant Reading. London: Verso.
  • November, V., Camacho-Hübner, E., & Latour, B. (2010). Entering a risky territory: space in the age of digital navigation. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(4), 581 – 599. doi:10.1068/d10409
  • Obar, J. A., Zube, P., & Lampe, C. (2012). Advocacy 2.0: An Analysis of How Advocacy Groups in the United States Perceive and Use Social Media as Tools for Facilitating Civic Engagement and Collective Action. Journal of Information Policy, 2(0). doi:10.5471/jip.v2i0.80
  • Pannapacker, W. (2009, December 28). The MLA and the Digital Humanities. Brainstorm. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogPost/The-MLAthe-Digital/19468/
  • Parasie, S., & Cointet, J.-P. (2013). Online press serving local democracy. Revue française de science politique (English), Vol. 62(1), 41–66. doi:10.3917/rfspe.621.0041
  • Rafols, I., Porter, A.L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1871-87. doi: 10.1002/asi.21368
  • Rip, A. (1997). Qualitative conditions of scientometrics: The new challenges. Scientometrics, 38(1), 7–26. doi:10.1007/ BF02461120
  • Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Roth, C., & Cointet, J.-P. (2010). Social and semantic coevolution in knowledge networks. Social Networks, 32(1), 16–29. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.04.005
  • Schmidli, J., M Stoll et T. Plattner, (2012, November 25). Le copinage gangrène les commandes fédérales. Le Matin. Retrieved from http://www.lematin.ch/suisse/copinage-gangrene-commandes-federales/story/17920779
  • Schoen, A., Villard, L., Laurens, P., Cointet, J.-P., Heimeriks, G., & Alkemade, F. (2012). The Network Structure of Technological Developments ; Technological Distance as a Walk on the Technology Map. STI Conference, ENID, Montreal, 734-742.
  • Selisker, S. (2012). In Defense of Data: Responses to Stephen Marche’s “Literature is not Data”. Retrieved from https://lareviewofbooks.org/essay/in-defense-of-data-responses-to-stephen-marches-literature-is-not-data/
  • Stanford Humanities Center. (2013). Mapping the Republic of Letters. Retrieved from http://republicofletters.stanford.edu/
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  • Tufte, E. R. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire, Conn.: Graphics Press.
  • Tufte, E. R. (2001). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information (2nd edition.). Cheshire, Conn.: Graphics Press. Turnbull, D. (2000). Masons, tricksters and cartographers makers of knowledge and space. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.
  • Venturini, T. & Latour, B.. (2010). The Social Fabric: Digital Traces and Quali-quantitative Methods. Proceedings of Future en Seine 2009, Paris.
  • Venturini, T., (2012), Great Expectations: Méthodes Quali-quantitative et Analyse des Réseaux Sociaux. Fourmentraux, J.P., (ed.), L’Ère Post-Média. Humanités Digitales et Cultures Numériques, Paris: Hermann, 39-51.
  • Weaver, W., (1948), Science and Complexity. American Scientist, 36, 536-544.
  • Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 14(3), 107–114. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0226
  • Ware, C. (2013). Information visualization: perception for design. San Francisco, Cal.: Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Yasseri, T., Sumi, R., Rung, A., Kornai, A., & Kertész, J. (2012). Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia. PLoS ONE, 7(6), e38869. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038869